Trusted DesignCVE-2023-20269 の詳細
CVEの情報
説明:
A vulnerability in the remote access VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a brute force attack in an attempt to identify valid username and password combinations or an authenticated, remote attacker to establish a clientless SSL VPN session with an unauthorized user.
This vulnerability is due to improper separation of authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) between the remote access VPN feature and the HTTPS management and site-to-site VPN features. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by specifying a default connection profile/tunnel group while conducting a brute force attack or while establishing a clientless SSL VPN session using valid credentials. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to achieve one or both of the following:
Identify valid credentials that could then be used to establish an unauthorized remote access VPN session.
Establish a clientless SSL VPN session (only when running Cisco ASA Software Release 9.16 or earlier).
Notes:
Establishing a client-based remote access VPN tunnel is not possible as these default connection profiles/tunnel groups do not and cannot have an IP address pool configured.
This vulnerability does not allow an attacker to bypass authentication. To successfully establish a remote access VPN session, valid credentials are required, including a valid second factor if multi-factor authentication (MFA) is configured.
Cisco will release software updates that address this vulnerability. There are workarounds that address this vulnerability.
CVE更新日: 2023-09-06 18:15:08.303000
CVSSバージョン: 3.1
CVSSスコア: 5.0
KEVの情報
KEV更新日: 2023-09-13
EPSSの情報
EPSSは脆弱性が今後30日以内に悪用される確率を予測するスコアリングシステムで、FIRST（Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams）が提供しています。
EPSSのスコアが高いということは、攻撃されるリスクが高いことを意味するので、早めの対策が必要です。
EPSSスコア: 0.008800000
EPSS更新日: 2026-01-14 00:00:00
SSVCの情報
SSVCはカーネギーメロン大学ソフトウェア工学研究所が提案する脆弱性の評価手法です。ステークホルダーごとに脆弱性対応の優先度を決定することを支援します。
本サイトでは、CVE、KEV、EPSSの内容からExploitation（悪用状況）、Technical Impact（技術的影響）、Automatable（自動攻撃の可否）を判定します。
Exploitation: active
Technical Impact: medium
Automatable: False